Archive for the ·

nikon coolpix p500

· Category...

Point & Shoot 4 Wildlife does Bugs!

1 comment

One of the primary advantages of today’s P&S super-zooms is that most of them have a great macro setting. Some cameras will capture an image of an object that is actually touching the surface of the lens. That is close. Better yet, most P&S super-zooms have a macro that reaches well out into the telephoto range, allowing you to capture tricky little things…like bugs…with relative ease. If your camera also has a articulated LCD…one that swivels or rotates for easy viewing, bug shots are that much easier.

The Nikon Coolpix P500, which is my current P&S, has a Close Up scene mode. Choosing it sets the zoom to 32mm equivalent field of view (the largest possible image scale, focusing at 2cm), focus to continuous with a movable focus point, and Optimization to Vivid. This is a great setting for flowers, but not much use for bugs…which are very likely to be off and away by the time you get that close. Fortunately you can override the zoom setting and use Close Up at more reasonable distances. The shot above, of a well worn Eastern Tiger Swallowtail, was at the full 810mm reach.

This Hover Fly on Queen Ann’s Lace was at 263mm equivalent field of view, still using the Close Up mode. With an aperture of f6.3, on a small a sensor camera, you would expect less focus separation between the subject and background. That is one advantage of the articulated LCD. It allows you to get down to bug level and often place the subject against a more distant background. However, I suspect that Nikon is doing a bit of digital trickery with the backgrounds in Close Up mode, as this degree of separation is still unexpected…and I know for a fact that some other P&S super-zooms create the separation effect in macros in software. This is good.

 

This Northern Pearly-eye Butterfly is at 403mm equivalent field of view. In addition to the fact that closer approach would likely have sent the butterfly on its way (sometimes it seems as though the very act of pointing a lens at a bug is enough to move it on), there was no way I could have gotten closer without stepping off the boardwalk (at Laudholm Farm in Wells ME), which is something I simply do not do.

The image is cropped from the full frame, but only by about 1/3…still leaving about 9 mp of solid detail. Clicking the image will open it in SmugMug’s lightbox where you can view it as large as your monitor will allow. Here, again due to the articulated LCD, I was able to easily shoot from hip height to put the bug against a darker background.

Dragonflies and their like are a whole different matter. The issue with dragonflies is focus. Well, and the fact that they don’t sit. This is one of several Twelve-spotted Skimmers that I caught at the Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens on a recent visit. This bug is among the easier to for auto focus to lock on to, as the wings are well patterned. It helps, though, to catch the bug on a prominent feature, like this purple flower, or against a background that is so distant all features are lost, like the following image. It the first case, at 499mm equivalent, the flower gave auto focus a separated object to lock on to for basic distance, so the camera was not driven to focus on the background. In the second case, at 435mm equivalent, the subject is so well separated from the background that focus found it easily.

Smaller dragonfly types, especially ones with completely clear wings, pose a more difficult focus problem.

I have lots of out of focus shots of this bug (a Female Blue Dasher as near as I can tell)…and it moved many times before the camera could find focus, before it finally settled on this bow of reed several inches in front of the reeds behind. Suddenly, at 499mm equivalent, it was easy. I actually started taking shots at about 250mm equivalent, and zoomed in by stages to reach this close shot. That is another technique to try. Don’t start at your full reach. Shoot shorter, with smaller image scale, and work your way in, advancing the zoom between shots. Often the camera will hold focus past where you expect it to fail, as it did here. The shot is slightly for composition and scale.

Working my way up to 435mm equivalent is the only way I got images of this smaller Blue Dasher)  sitting on the head of a stalk of Timothy.

I was able to work up to 620mm equivalent on this female Blue Dasher resting in the sun along the boardwalk at Laudholm Farms. This is another case where the long zoom-macro was the only option, as I could not have reached the bug any other way.

Butterflies and Dragonflies are the obvious bugs, but any bug caught close up is interesting.

These two wasp like specimens, which I have not yet identified, were shot at 340mm equivalent. The lesson hear is “do not be afraid to crop”. With 12-14-16mp these days, you can always increase the image scale by cropping to 9mp and still have lots of detail…easily enough for any web application, and for most printing.

This Honey Bee was at only 100mm equivalent, and cropped again to about 9mp.

While this bee (of some kind?) was at 372mm equivalent. Again it is cropped from the full frame.

Finally, don’t forget video. All the current P&S super-zooms do at least 720p HD video, and most of them do 1080p or 1080i (full HD). This video was shot in poor light…so poor that still shots were marginal at best…and had to be processed in Sony Vegas for brightness and contrast…but it is a record of what, for me at least, was a unique event…the massing of Wood Nymph Butterflies on a tree trunk at Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge.

Wood Nymph Butterflies at Rachel Carson NWR, Wells ME

While all these shots were taken with a super-zoom at longer focal lengths, that does not mean you should not attempt bugs. Most P&S with macro reach at least 100mm equivalent…and that can be enough to give you a decent 5-7mp crop of even the smallest bugs.

So, when next out with camera in hand, look down, look close, and do the bugs.

Point & Shoot 4 Wildlife for LBJs. Gotta have the reach!

no comments

The smaller the bird, the more reach you need to fill the frame effectively. Simple. You can take convincing (and satisfying) shots of Herons at close range (under 50 feet) with the 800mm end of a super-zoom P&S camera…but shots of sparrows and other Little Brown Jobs at that same range are not very satisfying. Sometimes, of course, you don’t have a choice. I would not take a digiscoping rig with tripod out on the boardwalk at Magee Marsh…just would not do it…so there the P&S super-zoom has to work…and does…see P&S 4 Wildlife. Part 2. Wicked Warblers. The saving grace at Magee is that the birds are close…sometimes within 12 feet…rarely over 20…and the birds are bright…so any reasonable capture is going to be satisfying…even if you can’t see the inner details of the individual feathers.

Still, given the choice, for sparrows and other LBJs, I would always choose a digiscoping rig.

This is a shot of a Song Sparrow at 45 feet with the Nikon Coolpix P500 at full (810mm equivalent field of view) zoom…and cropped down from full frame at that!

If you run the zoom up into the digital range, at 1600 mm this is what you get, again, cropped from full frame. Not bad for digital zoom, at that.

This is the same bird as the first image, from the same spot, using the Canon SD4000IS behind the 20-75x Vario eyepiece on the ZEISS DiaScope 85FL, first at just over 2200mm equivalent, and then at about 3500mm equivalent…full frame…uncropped…10 mp images.

Clearly, there is no comparison between the level of detail captured by the P&S and the digiscoping rig from the same distance, nor should anyone expect there to be. That reach is one of the primary advantages of digiscoping after all…and it is why we are carrying the scope in the first place.

Now, of course, if you live on the west coast, where some of the Song Sparrows are the size of Robins, you could probably get away with just the super-zoom most days :)

Point and Shoot for Wildlife Takes a Tern at Bolsa Chica

2 comments

On a recent birding, digiscoping, and photography expedition to Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve in Huntington Beach California I captured a series of images of a Forster’s Tern that dramatically demonstrate the range possible with two Point and Shoot cameras and a spotting scope. Equipment: 1) Nikon Coolpix P500, with a 36x zoom, 23mm to 810mm equivalent fields of view, 2) Canon PowerShot SD4000IS  behind the 20-75x Vario eyepiece on a ZEISS DiaScope 85FL spotting scope, for equivalent fields of view in the 1000-5000mm range. I have also included an HD video shot with the Canon SD4000IS and ZEISS DiaScope, and a few flight shots of the Terns, taken with the Coolpix…just to demonstrate further possibilities.

23mm equivalent field of view, Nikon Coolpix P500, notice the Forster’s Tern on the post.

Same Tern, 810mm equivalent, Nikon Coolpix P500, pretty amazing range in a compact P&S

Preening action, 1300mm equivalent, Canon SD4000IS at 65mm equivalent and ZEISS DiaScope at 20x

3650mm equivalent, Canon SD4000IS at 91mm equivalent, ZEISS DiaScope at 40x

As you can see, these four shots, taken from exactly the same position within moments of each other show off the advantages of a two camera Point and Shoot / Spotting Scope rig for wildlife.

To add spice to the mix, the video below was as easy as flicking the capture switch on the Canon SD4000IS from still to video. All these shots, by the way, were taken in pretty poor light, from a boardwalk with lots of traffic. I had to run the video through the image stabilization in Sony Vegas HD to remove the boardwalk bounces…and I am sure the process degrades resolution somewhat.

Forster’s Tern Preening, Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, CA: Canon SD4000IS and ZEISS DiaScope 85FL

Finally, I set up on the boardwalk with the Nikon Coolpix at about 160mm equivalent to attempt to capture some Terns in flight. I used my self programmed Flight and Action scene mode (saved to the User mode on the Coolpix), but the birds were moving so fast I had to back well off on the 810mm reach. These are cropped from full frame.

All the still shots were processed in Lightroom for Clarity and Sharpness.

I am not attempting to convert conventional long lens photographers with posts like this. I am well aware that with an investment of $20,000 or more in an outfit weighing something close to 20 pounds, I could get, perhaps, better image quality over this same range. What this series does for me is to confirm that the equipment I can afford (total, including tripod, around $4500) and am willing to carry (total weight, again including tripod, in the 9 pound range) will produce satisfying results with most any wildlife challenge I am faced with.

If you are like me, you might also be inspired to consider the Point and Shoot for Wildlife solution.

Point & Shoot for Wildlife: Superzooms, Part 2: Wicked Warblers

8 comments

I don’t think there is anything harder than photographing warblers during migration, when they are generally feeding frantically to fuel for the next hop, and always, it sometimes seems, at least partially obscured by foliage and branches.

Magee Marsh/Crane Creek, along the Ohio shore of Lake Erie, is a good place, in some ways, to try. The birds are certainly there. In a few hours you can see 30 or more species of warblers every spring, staging for a day or sometimes two, along with Tanagers, Orioles, Thrushes, Grosbeaks, Sparrows, etc., nesting Screech Owls, and resident Rails and Herons. And the warblers are there in good numbers. You can see a dozen Prothonotarys, 20 Blackburnian, 50 Black-throated Green or American Redstarts in the space of an hour. Then too, the persistent will encounter the occasional rare Connecticut, Morning, or Golden-wing. Lots of birds, for sure.

But with that comes lots of birders. And photographers. Hence the “some ways” above. The past two years the Black Swamp Bird Observatory, Ottawa NWR, and Tropical Birding Tours, have organized an event around the phenomenon of Magee Marsh and migration. The boardwalk is often so jammed with binocular and camera wielding humanity that it is literally impossible to move. Little old ladies (and big strong men) get stranded for hours a few yards short of where everyone else is seeing the Connecticut. Even when the press is less, it is not uncommon to find 200 birders and photographers in 100 yards of boardwalk. And tripods supporting 600mm lenses? Don’t get me started on that! While I understand the impulse to drag a 6 foot tall tripod, 14 pounds and 24 inches of lens, and a foot long flash hood out on to a boardwalk with hundreds of birders trying to see warblers (and all the little folk with their 300mm zooms), I can not say that I fully approve. Nothing stops traffic like a tripod blocking half the boardwalk.

It is a unique experience, however you look at it. And, despite my quibbles, one I would not personally miss for anything! In fact I am thankful for The Biggest Week in American Birding…without which I might never have heard of Magee Marsh.

But back to P&S for Wildlife. Given the abundance, but also the the difficulty, of the subjects, along with the press of humanity, the Magee Marsh boardwalk provides the ideal torture test for Point & Shoot for Wildlife. “Wicked warblers” as they would say in my part of Maine. Wicked hard on a P&S. If a superzoom can manage to get satisfying warbler images under Magee Marsh and The Biggest Week in American Birding conditions, it can manage anywhere, any time.

Prothonotary Warbler: 810mm, f5.7 @ 1/1000th @ ISO 160

Full disclosure here: the images that illustrate this post are among the 211 that I processed out of 1650 exposures that I took while in Ohio. That is a keeper rate of about 13%. Some of those 211, certainly, are only good “for the record”…saved only because they are the only decent image I got of a particular species. I used my User selected flight and action mode on the Nikon Coolpix P500, which means that I shot 5 images at 8 frames per second with every press of the shutter release. That accounts, in part, for the large number of exposures…but it also accounts, in part, for the relatively high percentage of keepers. “Wait,” you say, “how is 13% high?” In my opinion, and my experience, anything better than 1 in 10 is a high keeper rate when shooting long lens…even if the long lens is the long end of a P&S zoom…maybe especially if the long lens is the long end of a P&S zoom…and certainly when shooting warblers in the woods…with any camera!

User Flight and Action mode:
full size (12mp)
fine image quality
8 fps for 5 frames
center and continuous focus
center metering
auto ISO and a minimum shutter speed of 1/125 second
hybrid Vibration Reduction
LCD off
zoom fully extended (810mm equivalent)

Even at longest zoom, many of these images were cropped from the full frame.

American Redstart: 668mm, f5.7 @ 1/125th @ ISO 160

Scarlet Tanager: 500mm, f5.7 @ 1/640th @ ISO 160

Rose-breasted Grosbeak: 810mm, f5.7 @ 1/400th @ ISO 160

Chestnut Sided Warbler: 500mm, f5.7 @ 1/200th @ ISO 160

Catbird: 810mm, f5.7 @ 1/125th @ ISO 160

Blackburnian Warbler: 668mm, f5.7 @ 1/500th @ ISO 160

Gray-cheeked Thrush: 668mm, f5.7 @ 1/125 @ ISO 500

The Thrush was taken in very poor light, sprinkling in fact, and the minimum 1/125th setting I use as part of my Flight and Action program caught and pushed the ISO up to 500. Not bad at all! The Black and White that follows is also an higher ISO shot, due to subdued light, but most of the time the P500 managed to hold the base 160 ISO.

Black and White Warbler, 668mm, f5.7 @ 1/125th @ ISO 180

Prothonotary Warbler, 810mm, f5.7 @ 1/640th @ ISO 160

Wood Thrush: 668mm, f5.7 @ 1/125th @ ISO 280

Yellow-rumped Warbler: 668mm, f5.7 @ 1/125th @ ISO 500

Magnolia Warbler: 668mm, f5.7 @ 1/320th @ ISO 160

And three shots of a Golden-winged Warbler…none of which capture more than a piece of the bird, but which you can assemble like a puzzle to see it.

And we will finish (almost) with the obligatory Screech Owl shot.

810mm, f5.7 @ 1/160th @ ISO 160

Just for fun, one last shot of half-dollar sized infant Painted Turtle on the boardwalk at Ottawa NWR. Taken with the macro setting at 500mm. Full frame, uncropped.

500mm and macro, f5.7 @ 1/400th @ ISO 160

I am more than happy with the results of the Magee Marsh Point & Shoot for Wildlife torture test. Certainly I might have bettered these with a DSLR and longish lens, but it would have been much more unwieldy on the boardwalk, and much less flexible (no zoom for one thing). Wicked warblers. Bring them on!

Point & Shoot 4 Wildlife, Superzooms: part 1

6 comments

So, having priced a DSLR and a 600-800mm lens, and having seen a few over burdened photographers in the field, you are wondering, if you are anything like me, if there are alternatives…something less expensive…something more physically manageable as you are out and about…and maybe even something more flexible.

Enter the sophisticated superzoom Point & Shoot cameras. Superzooms are sometimes called “bridge” cameras…they are larger and more sophisticated (and more expensive) than the mostly pocket-sized P&Ss, and feature, of course, much more zoom range.

I have taken wildlife shots with my various superzoom Point & Shoot cameras over the past several years, beginning with a Sony H9 with, if I remember right, a 12x zoom, and gotten some satisfying results. My Canon SX20IS with a 20x zoom reaching to 560mm equivalent gave me reach enough for many shots, but the .8 frames per second rapid capture mode (yes that is a “.” there…a fractional frame rate) made shooting wildlife very difficult. And of course, flight shots, as the most difficult of wildlife shots, were next to impossible.

Of course, anything is possible if you have cooperative birds and shoot enough frames. This shot is from the Canon SX20IS at Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge where there are, pretty much, birds in the air all the time, and where the geese and cranes, landing and taking off, present predictable targets.  Putting the camera on “sports mode” pushed the ISO, shutter speed, and f-stop toward higher values to freeze the action. 560mm equivalent field of view, f8 @ 1/1250th @ ISO 320.

This shot is also from the SX20IS, at 560mm equivalent, f8 @ 1/400th @ ISO 400.

More sedentary subjects, even if still active, made easier targets. 560mm equivalent, f5.7 @ 1/400th @ ISO 200, program mode.

With these kinds of shots behind me, I was quite excited to see the first of the Back-illuminated CMOS sensor superzooms come out. BICMOS sensors feature better high ISO performance (in theory) and much faster capture time…which allows for both higher frame rates and full HD video. The Panasonic FZ100 was the first, featuring a 600mm equivalent zoom, and 5 frames per second. However, the reviews of image quality were disappointing, and the increase to 600mm over 560mm was just not enough to justify the investment.

Panasonic was the first, but most of the majors now have a BICMOS superzoom in the stable (except for Canon). I gave the Fuji HS20, with its 30x, 720mm equivalent zoom, 16mp sensor, and up to 11 frames per second, a shot (or several hundred), but, as with the Panasonic, the image quality, especially on landscapes, was simply too disappointing for me to carry it as my day-in-day-out camera. The images looked okay at smaller screen resolutions, but an 8.5×11 print, or higher resolution on the screen, they showed way too much water-color effect. Fine details were smeared and blurred. Colors that should have been even gradients were patchy, poster like, etc. The images actually looked more like paintings than photographs.

I did a fair amount of looking at sample images on the internet, and returned the Fuji for the Nikon Coolpix P500, with an 12mp BICMOS sensor, a 36x zoom (23mm to 810mm equivalent), and a rapid capture frame rate at full resolution of 8 frames per second for 5 frames, or 1.8 frames per second for 24 frames (you can actually shoot up to 240 fps at lower resolutions) and full HD video capture.

Of course I also appreciate the 2cm macro, the flip out LCD, the night landscape mode, the built in HDR mode, sweep panorama and assisted panorama, and other in-camera magic made possible by the rapid capture ability of the BICMOS sensor.

I got the camera just in time for two major trips: The first to the Florida Birding and Photo Fest in St. Augustine Florida…with a major Wood Stork, Egret, and Heron rookery and lots of flight shot opportunities…and the second, back to back, to The Biggest Week in American Birding at Magee Marsh and Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge along the Ohio shore of Lake Erie…with abundant opportunity to try the camera on the most difficult of subjects…feeding warblers.

I did have time before I left to assure myself that, while the Nikon P500 might not fully equal the image quality of my Canon SX20IS at lower ISOs, it came very close, while providing superior high ISO performance. Given all the other advanced features of the camera, especially the high frame rate and the 23mm-810mm zoom, I felt I could live with the IQ. Good to go birding!

If you intend to shoot flight shots, or even just active birds, with your superzoom the place to start is probably the Sports mode. Most of these cameras have one. Setting the camera on Sports keeps the shutter speed as high as possible while maintaining relatively small apertures for depth of field, sets the focus mode to center of field and continuous, and generally selects rapid capture of some variety. It may also turn on follow focus if your camera has that feature, and it almost certainly will set the exposure metering area to center of frame. On the Nikon, it also sets the image size to medium (8mp) and the image quality to normal (medium jpeg compression) to ensure it can manage the 8 frames per second capture. After a day of experimentation with Sports Mode and some static testing I determined that the camera, with a Class 6 SD card, would still manage 8 fps on full size (12 mp) and fine image quality (low jpeg compression), so I programmed similar settings into the User Mode (memory) to create my own flight and action mode. Now when I set the camera on U (for User), it sets to full size, fine image quality, 8 fps for 5 frames, center and continuous focus, center metering with auto ISO and a minimum shutter speed of 1/125 second, hybrid Vibration Reduction, LCD off, and zoom fully extended (810mm equivalent).

As an added benefit, not having to use Sports mode on the Scene setting, I can then leave Scene mode set to Macro…my third most common setting, and have just three stops on the control dial for 90% of my shooting: Program for general shooting (with things like Active D Lighting (extended dynamic range), and Vivid Image Optimization to add punch to landscapes), User for flight and action, and Scene for Macros.

So, how does it work?

620mm equivalent field of view, f5.7 @ 1/320th @ ISO 160. Sports Mode for 8mp, normal IQ.

309mm equivalent, f5.4 @ 1/1500th @ ISO 160. Sports mode for 8mp, normal IQ.

810mm equivalent, f5.7 @ 1/640th @ ISO 160, User Flight and Action mode, 12mp and Fine IQ.

668mm equivalent, f5.7 @ 1/125th @ ISO 180. User Flight and Action mode, 12mp and Fine IQ (note that the 1/125 second minimum pushed the ISO to 180 to maintain exposure).

500mm equivalent, f6.3 @ 1/800th @ ISO 160, User Flight and Action mode, 12mp (cropped), Fine IQ.

810mm and Macro, f5.7 @ 1/100th @ ISO 160. Program mode. 12mp and Fine IQ, Vivid Processing.

None of these shots, very likely, are publication quality in the magazine sense. They might or might not look okay at 300dpi on the printed page…but that is not what I am up to. I am out there to enjoy the birds and taking pictures with equipment I can afford and am wiling to carry.

And, as an added bonus, I get to use the camera for shots like these.

Night landscape mode: three images taken automatically in a fraction of a second, and stacked in camera for sharpness and color.

180 degree assisted, full resolution, panorama…stitched in PhotoMerge in PhotoShop Elements 9.

Macro from less than 1/2 inch. 32mm equivalent, f3.7 @ 1/1000 @ ISO 160. Macro mode.

Backlight mode with HDR on…three exposures stacked for extended dynamic range in camera, processed for clarity and levels in Lightroom.

So, yes, it works. The Nikon Coolpix, standing in as the representative of the new BICMOS superzoom cameras clearly (to my mind) demonstrates the potential of the class for effective wildlife and general scenic photography. With a zoom range from 23mm and super macro to 810mm equivalent (over 900mm on some cameras), rapid capture up to 8 frames per second (even faster on some of the superzooms), and all kinds of in-camera specialty modes, today’s superzooms pack a huge range of application into a very small (comparatively) and inexpensive (relatively) package. To my mind, that makes them the ideal field companion for the aspiring wildlife and nature photographer, at least those who are in it for the fun of it.

Will a BICMOS Superzoom substitute for the professional level full frame DSLR and the 600mm IS lens with 2x extender shooting from a blind…no…of course not. Auto focus is slower and not as accurate, for one thing, manual focus is a non-starter, and the small sensor is pushing the limits of what can be done for both noise and image quality. But, they are certainly a lot of fun and will bring home, often enough, images that will satisfy any but the most demanding of photographers and viewers. To me the most important word there is fun! I am still an amateur. I do photography, specifically nature and wildlife, because I love it…it has to be fun.

In the next post, we will look at Superzooms in the ultimate wildlife test…catching feeding warblers in deep forest during migration!